| Publication date: 20/01/2017 | |
|---|---|
Status: 
|
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ |
Short description: Genealogical network corresponding to ten case studies of marriage contracts among the aboriginal Australian Tiwi people of Melville Islands
| Name: | Tiwi |
|---|---|
| Simplified name: | tiwi |
| Author: | Jane C. Goodale |
| Coder: | Klaus Hamberger |
| Contributor: | Klaus Hamberger |
| Contact: | - |
| Creation date: | 16/01/2017 |
| Edition date: | 16/01/2017 |
| Ethnic or cultural group: | Tiwi |
|---|---|
| Atlas code: | Id3 |
| Language group: | - |
| Location: | Melville Island |
|---|---|
| Country: | Australia |
| Region: | Australia |
| Continent: | Oceania |
| Coordinate: | 11° 33′ 0″ S, 130° 56′ 0″ E |
| Radius from center (km): | - |
| Period covered by the dataset: | 1885-1960 |
|---|---|
| Period of data collection: | 1954-1960 |
| Period note: | - |
| Permanent link: | https://www.kinsources.net/kidarep/dataset-216-tiwi.xhtml |
|---|---|
| Conditions of use: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ |
| Other repositories: | - |
| Dataset history: | - |
| Citation: | - |
| How to cite: | Jane C. Goodale (2017), Tiwi dataset, https://www.kinsources.net/kidarep/dataset-216-tiwi.xhtml |
| Collection notes (circumstances, sources, methods, funding, coverage…): |
Doctoral fieldwork (10 months) in 1954 |
|---|---|
| Reference: | - |
| Bibliography: | Jane C. Goodale, Tiwi wives : a study of the women of Melville Island, North Australia. University of Washington Press. 1971 |
| Description: | - |
|---|
| Individuals | 87 | Unions | 48 | Relations | 43 | Generations | 5 |
|---|
| Individuals | 87 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | 39 | 44.83 | % | |
| Women | 48 | 55.17 | % | |
| Unknown | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
| Non single men | 39 | |||
| Non single women | 45 | |||
| Mean spouse of men | 1.3 | |||
| Mean spouse of women | 1.26 | |||
| Co-husband_relations | 13 | |||
| Co-wife_relations | 16 |
| Unions | 48 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marriages | 48 | |||
| Marriages density | 64.15 | % | ||
| Fertile marriages | 5 | 10.42 | % | |
| Parent child ties | 63 | |||
| Filiation density | 84.2 | % | ||
| First cousin marriages | 4 | 8.33 | % | |
| Cross (first) cousin marriages | 4 | 8.33 | % | |
| Parallel (first) cousin marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
| Niece/Nephew marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
| Levirate marriages | 4 | 8.33 | % | |
| Sororate marriages | 10 | 20.83 | % | |
| Double or exchange marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
| Double marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
| Exchange marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
| Mean children per fertile couple | 1.2 |
| Depth | 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Depth mean | 0.52 | |
| Agnatic fratry size mean | 2.5 | |
| Uterine fratry size mean | 1.55 | |
| Components | 4 | |
| Mean components share (agnatic) | 1.39 | % |
| without singleton | 33 | % |
| Mean components share (uterine) | 2.56 | % |
| without singleton | 7.1 | % |
| Max components (agnatic) | 9.20 | % |
| Max components (uterine) | 10.34 | % |
.png "Gender BIAS (weight)")
.png "Gender BIAS (net weight)")
.png "Ancestor Chains (degree=3)")
| Scope | Count | Labels |
|---|---|---|
| Corpus | 1 | Kinsources permanent link |
| Individuals | 7 | BIRT_DATE, CODER, DOUBLE, GENEALOGY, PHRATRY_SECTION, PHRATRY_SHADE, SIB |
| Families | 2 | CODER, DOUBLE |
| CASE | 1 | PAGE |
| SIBLING | 1 | TYPE |
| Scope | Label | Not set | % | set blank | % | Filled | % | Set | % | Max. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORPUS | Kinsources permanent link | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
| INDIVIDUALS | BIRT_DATE | 43 | 49.43 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 44 | 50.57 % | 44 | 50.57 % | 87 |
| INDIVIDUALS | CODER | 64 | 73.56 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 23 | 26.44 % | 23 | 26.44 % | 87 |
| INDIVIDUALS | DOUBLE | 72 | 82.76 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 15 | 17.24 % | 15 | 17.24 % | 87 |
| INDIVIDUALS | GENEALOGY | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 87 | 100.00 % | 87 | 100.00 % | 87 |
| INDIVIDUALS | PHRATRY_SECTION | 21 | 24.14 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 66 | 75.86 % | 66 | 75.86 % | 87 |
| INDIVIDUALS | PHRATRY_SHADE | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 87 | 100.00 % | 87 | 100.00 % | 87 |
| INDIVIDUALS | SIB | 20 | 22.99 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 67 | 77.01 % | 67 | 77.01 % | 87 |
| FAMILIES | CODER | 85 | 96.59 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 3 | 3.41 % | 3 | 3.41 % | 88 |
| FAMILIES | DOUBLE | 84 | 95.45 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 4 | 4.55 % | 4 | 4.55 % | 88 |
| CASE | PAGE | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 10 | 100.00 % | 10 | 100.00 % | 10 |
| SIBLING | TYPE | 1 | 3.03 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 32 | 96.97 % | 32 | 96.97 % | 33 |
| Control type | Anomaly count |
|---|---|
| AUTO_MARRIAGE | 0 |
| CYCLIC_DESCENT_CASES | 0 |
| FEMALE_FATHERS_OR_MALE_MOTHERS | 0 |
| MULTIPLE_FATHERS_OR_MOTHERS | 0 |
| PARENT_CHILD_MARRIAGES | 0 |
| SAME_SEX_SPOUSES | 0 |
| NAMELESS_PERSONS | 32 |
| UNKNOWN_SEX_PERSONS | 0 |
| UNKNOWN_SEX_PARENTS_SPOUSES | 0 |
| UNKNOWN_RELATIVES | 0 |
| INCONSISTENT_DATES | 6 |
| MISSING_DATES | 62 |
| MISSING_DATES_COMPACT | 62 |
