Dataset "Shoshone 1860 ND10" ID 4  Genealogy Type

Author: Julian H. Steward Publication date: 16/05/2010
Status: License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0

Short description: Genealogical, demographic and census data for Eastern California Shoshone in 1860.


General

Name: Shoshone 1860 ND10
Simplified name: shoshone_1860_nd10
Author: Julian H. Steward
Coder: Woodrow W. Denham
Contributor: Woodrow W. Denham
Contact: Woodrow W. Denham
Creation date: 20/11/2013
Edition date: 20/11/2013

Culture

Ethnic or cultural group: Shoshone
Atlas code: Nd46
Language group: -

Place

Location: California
Country: USA
Region: North America
Continent: America
Coordinate: -
Radius from center (km): -

Time

Period covered by the dataset: 1860/1890
Period of data collection: -
Period note: -

Data publication

Permanent link:
Conditions of use: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0
Other repositories: -
Dataset history: -
Citation: Steward, Julian, H. (1938) Basin-Plateau Aboriginal Socio-Political Groups. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 120.
How to cite: Julian H. Steward (2010), Shoshone 1860 ND10 dataset, https://www.kinsources.net/kidarep/dataset-4-shoshone-1860-nd10.xhtml

Data collection

Collection notes
(circumstances, sources, methods, funding, coverage…):
-
Reference: -
Bibliography: -

Description

Description: Native Americans, Lemhi River Agiduka, Eastern California, USA, 1860; 95 cases, 2 censuses.

Dataset file

Attachments (4/5)

Individuals 95   Unions 25   Relations 0   Generations 3

Statistics

Individuals 95
Men 44   46.32 %
Women 49   51.58 %
Unknown 2   2.11 %
Non single men 23
Non single women 25
Mean spouse of men 1.09
Mean spouse of women 1.0
Co-husband_relations 0
Co-wife_relations 2
 
Unions 25
Marriages 25  
Marriages density     28.0 %
Fertile marriages 21   84.0 %
Parent child ties 132  
Filiation density     147.82 %
First cousin marriages 0   0.0 %
Cross (first) cousin marriages 0   0.0 %
Parallel (first) cousin marriages 0   0.0 %
Niece/Nephew marriages 0   0.0 %
Levirate marriages 0   0.0 %
Sororate marriages 4   16.0 %
Double or exchange marriages 0   0.0 %
Double marriages 0   0.0 %
Exchange marriages 0   0.0 %
Mean children per fertile couple 3.14
 
Depth 3
Depth mean 1.36
Agnatic fratry size mean 3.47
Uterine fratry size mean 3.14
 
Components 6
Mean components share (agnatic) 3.45 %
without singleton 7.1 %
Mean components share (uterine) 3.45 %
without singleton 8.3 %
Max components (agnatic) 14.74 %
Max components (uterine) 10.53 %

Graphics

Gender BIAS (weight)
Gender BIAS (weight)
Gender BIAS (net weight)
Gender BIAS (net weight)
Components
Components
Genealogical Completeness
Genealogical Completeness
Sibset Distribution
Sibset Distribution
First Cousin Marriages
First Cousin Marriages
Ancestor Chains (degree=3)
Ancestor Chains (degree=3)
Consanguines per person
Consanguines per person
Genders
Genders
PEDG 2
PEDG 2
PEDG 3
PEDG 3
Union Status
Union Status

Attributes

Scope Count Labels
Individuals 5 AGE, ALIVE, MARSTAT, RES1, RES2


Scope Label Not set % set blank % Filled % Set % Max.
INDIVIDUALS AGE 0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 95 100.00 % 95 100.00 % 95
INDIVIDUALS ALIVE 0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 95 100.00 % 95 100.00 % 95
INDIVIDUALS MARSTAT 0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 95 100.00 % 95 100.00 % 95
INDIVIDUALS RES1 0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 95 100.00 % 95 100.00 % 95
INDIVIDUALS RES2 0 0.00 % 0 0.00 % 95 100.00 % 95 100.00 % 95

Controls

Control type Anomaly count
AUTO_MARRIAGE 0
CYCLIC_DESCENT_CASES 0
FEMALE_FATHERS_OR_MALE_MOTHERS 0
MULTIPLE_FATHERS_OR_MOTHERS 0
PARENT_CHILD_MARRIAGES 0
SAME_SEX_SPOUSES 0
NAMELESS_PERSONS 0
UNKNOWN_SEX_PERSONS 2
UNKNOWN_SEX_PARENTS_SPOUSES 0
UNKNOWN_RELATIVES 0
INCONSISTENT_DATES 0
MISSING_DATES 0
MISSING_DATES_COMPACT 0
© Développement : DEVINSY
© Webdesign : Aurélie Martial

ANR
Huma-Num
CNRS
EHESS
Collège de France
Université de Paris Sorbonne
Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense
CSAC Kent University