Publication date: 14/05/2010 | |
---|---|
Status: | License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 |
Short description: White et al.'s transcription of Robert Barnes’ compilation of Dorsey's and other Omaha genealogical materials
Name: | Omaha 1880 |
---|---|
Simplified name: | omaha_1880 |
Author: | James O. Dorsey, Alice C. Fletcher, Robert H. Barnes |
Coder: | Douglas R. White, Janel Tortorice |
Contributor: | Douglas R. White |
Contact: | Douglas R. White |
Creation date: | 20/11/2013 |
Edition date: | 20/11/2013 |
Ethnic or cultural group: | Omaha |
---|---|
Atlas code: | Nf3 SCCS143 |
Language group: | - |
Location: | Nebraska |
---|---|
Country: | USA |
Region: | North America |
Continent: | America |
Coordinate: | - |
Radius from center (km): | - |
Period covered by the dataset: | - |
---|---|
Period of data collection: | - |
Period note: | - |
Permanent link: | https://www.kinsources.net/kidarep/dataset-90-omaha-1880.xhtml |
---|---|
Conditions of use: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 |
Other repositories: | - |
Dataset history: | - |
Citation: | unpubl manus by Douglas R White, Janel Tortorice and Peter Thompson “Omaha / ‘omaha’ : networks and alliance” (January 1995, rev. 2008) http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/pw/OMAHA1White_Tortorice_Thompson.pdf Thompson, Peter M. 1997. http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/pw/CompetitiveInheritance_ofTitle_Omaha The Competitive Inheritance of Title in the 19th Century Omaha]. Independent Study with Douglas R. White. |
How to cite: | James O. Dorsey, Alice C. Fletcher, Robert H. Barnes (2010), Omaha 1880 dataset, https://www.kinsources.net/kidarep/dataset-90-omaha-1880.xhtml |
Collection notes (circumstances, sources, methods, funding, coverage…): |
Six columns for OmahaCL.xls columns Ego Sexe name Fa Mo Spouse In the form we see in appendix 1, each individual is given a unique identification number (col.1) and these numbers are used to refer to father (col. 7), mother (col. 8) and one or more spouses (col. 6, listed on separate lines), if known. Dorsey's codes (cols. 2-3) identify members within each gens by number and give spouses the same number followed by lower case letters. Individual names, both in Omaha and English (the latter from the census of 1883) and other cross-reference information are given (col. 4), along with birthdate and deathdate (cols. 9-10) where known.” |
---|---|
Reference: | - |
Bibliography: | Barnes, Robert. H. 1984. Two Crows Denies it: A History of Controversy in Omaha Sociology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; Dorsey, James O. 1884. Omaha Sociology. Third Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to the Secretary of the Smithsonian, 1881-1882: 205-307; Fletcher, Alice C. 1897. Home Life among the Indians. Century Magazine 54 (n.s.): 252-263.; Fletcher, Alice C., and Francis La Flesche. 1911. 2 vols. The Omaha Tribe. 27th Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, D.C. |
Description: | White, Tortorice and Thompson (1995/2008): “assembled Robert Barnes’ compilation of Dorsey's and other Omaha genealogical materials, and White cleaned the data using computer programs for cross-checking for consistency, then consulting with Tortorice as well as Barnes’ (1984) and Dorsey’s indexed publications. |
---|
Individuals | 1513 | Unions | 546 | Relations | 0 | Generations | 7 |
---|
Individuals | 1513 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Men | 781 | 51.62 | % | |
Women | 732 | 48.38 | % | |
Unknown | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
Non single men | 781 | |||
Non single women | 732 | |||
Mean spouse of men | 1.33 | |||
Mean spouse of women | 1.14 | |||
Co-husband_relations | 81 | |||
Co-wife_relations | 189 |
Unions | 546 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Marriages | 546 | |||
Marriages density | 2.39 | % | ||
Fertile marriages | 276 | 50.55 | % | |
Parent child ties | 1671 | |||
Filiation density | 7.3 | % | ||
First cousin marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
Cross (first) cousin marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
Parallel (first) cousin marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
Niece/Nephew marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
Levirate marriages | 12 | 2.2 | % | |
Sororate marriages | 13 | 2.38 | % | |
Double or exchange marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
Double marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
Exchange marriages | 0 | 0.0 | % | |
Mean children per fertile couple | 2.19 |
Depth | 7 | |
---|---|---|
Depth mean | 1.22 | |
Agnatic fratry size mean | 2.79 | |
Uterine fratry size mean | 2.74 | |
Components | 68 | |
Mean components share (agnatic) | 0.17 | % |
without singleton | 0.65 | % |
Mean components share (uterine) | 0.13 | % |
without singleton | 0.46 | % |
Max components (agnatic) | 4.10 | % |
Max components (uterine) | 1.39 | % |
Scope | Count | Labels |
---|---|---|
Corpus | 8 | CHAR, DATE, DEST, FILE, SOUR, SUBM_ADDR, SUBM_NAME, SUBM_PHON |
Families | 1 | REFN |
Scope | Label | Not set | % | set blank | % | Filled | % | Set | % | Max. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORPUS | CHAR | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
CORPUS | DATE | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
CORPUS | DEST | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
CORPUS | FILE | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
CORPUS | SOUR | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
CORPUS | SUBM_ADDR | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
CORPUS | SUBM_NAME | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
CORPUS | SUBM_PHON | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 | 100.00 % | 1 |
FAMILIES | REFN | 0 | 0.00 % | 0 | 0.00 % | 1277 | 100.00 % | 1277 | 100.00 % | 1277 |
Control type | Anomaly count |
---|---|
AUTO_MARRIAGE | 0 |
CYCLIC_DESCENT_CASES | 0 |
FEMALE_FATHERS_OR_MALE_MOTHERS | 0 |
MULTIPLE_FATHERS_OR_MOTHERS | 0 |
PARENT_CHILD_MARRIAGES | 0 |
SAME_SEX_SPOUSES | 0 |
NAMELESS_PERSONS | 63 |
UNKNOWN_SEX_PERSONS | 0 |
UNKNOWN_SEX_PARENTS_SPOUSES | 0 |
UNKNOWN_RELATIVES | 0 |
INCONSISTENT_DATES | 0 |
MISSING_DATES | 0 |
MISSING_DATES_COMPACT | 0 |